Short Summary of Major Cross-Cutting Evaluation Findings
from HRSA/HAB's Cooperative Agreements on Innovative Models of Care

Frequently Updated and Supplemented
Last Updated: November 13, 2009

The Measurement Group
G. J. Huba, Ph.D.
Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.
A. T. Panter, Ph.D.

Supporting data and statistical models are given in the full Knowledge Base. Access the full Knowledge Base by clicking on the buttons at the end of this page or the "light blue" portion of the banner at the top of the page. To see the full Knowledge Item from which a summary point derives, click on the figure.

Click on the links below to navigate the major summary points derived from the HIV/AIDS Knowledge Base.

Summary Point 1. Client Service Need, Vulnerability, and Demographic Factors
Summary Point 2. Change in Medical Indicators Over Time
Summary Point 3. Change Over Time in Self-Rated Quality of Life
Summary Point 4. Days Retained in Program by Needs and Drug Abuse
Summary Point 5. Retention in Psychosocial Services Based on Case Management
Summary Point 6. Client Satisfaction Based on Type of Project
Summary Point 7. Results of Follow Up Training Interviews
Summary Point 8. Introduction of Triple Combination Therapy
Summary Point 9. Triple Combination Therapy and Change in Medical Indicators Over Time

Summary Point 10. Likelihood of Receiving Services by Time in Program

Summary Point 11. Change in Self-Rated Quality of Life by Satisfaction with Services

Summary Point 12. Training Quality Ratings

Summary Point 13. Change Over Time in Client Distress

Summary Point 14. Change in Client Barriers Over Time
Summary Point 15. Change Over Time in Self-Reported Symptoms
Summary Point 16. Probability of Retaining CD4 Count by Type of Clinic
Summary Point 17. Probability of Maintaining Karnofsky Rating by Type of Clinic
Summary Point 18. Probability of Maintaining Viral Load at or Below Baseline
Summary Point 19. Probability of Same or Improved Psychological Distress Level
Summary Points 20 - 40. Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Service Need, Vulnerability, and Demographic Factors
Summary Points 41 - 60. Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Service Need, Vulnerability, and Demographic Factors

Client Service Need, Vulnerability, and Demographic Factors

Summary Point 1: Access to services has been provided to more than 4,800 individuals living with HIV/AIDS. The treatment populations for both medical services and psychosocial supports is heavily skewed toward individuals with a number of service needs-vulnerabilities (an average of 6.94 such factors out of 15 coded).

  • 6.0% were under age 21 or over age 55;

  • 72.5% were people of color;

  • 11.9% had a primary language other than English;

  • 20.0% had children requiring care;

  • 45.3% had an education of less than 12 years;

  • 85.7% were unemployed or not working;

  • 88.9% were dependent on public support for medical insurance (no private insurance);

  • 28.2% used or had used heroin;

  • 44.9% used or had used crack;

  • 56.9% used or had used another illicit drug;

  • 54.2% had a current or prior alcohol problem;

  • 49.7% were or had been involved with the criminal justice system;

  • 22.1% engaged in current or prior sex work;

  • 42.9% engaged in current or prior sex with an injection drug user;

  • 46.4% were without stable housing.

At the time of enrollment, the participants who entered these programs report a number of prior unmet service needs and previously experienced barriers to care.

Distribution of the Total Number of Service Needs - Vulnerabilities for Males and Females with HIV/AIDS Enrolling in the Cooperative Agreement Projects


 Change in Medical Indicators Over Time

Summary Point 2: Patients in SPNS treatment programs were offered (and received) recommended medical treatments including HAART when it was available. Statistical [HLM] models show that the health of patients improves significantly over time as assessed with CD4 count and viral load tests. The degree of change is only very minimally related to factors indicative of behavioral issues such as drug abuse, sex work, and unstable housing. Additional analyses examine the role, timing, pharmaceutical variations of HAART treatment within the episode and the interactions of HAART treatment and behavioral factors that may limit adherence to medical recommendations.


Change Over Time in Self-Rated Quality of Life

Summary Point 3: Patients in the SPNS treatment programs report significantly improved health-related quality of life over the course of their treatment episode. Statistical [HLM] models show that on average self-reported quality of life improves significantly over time, and that such gains may be maintained for periods of several years. While all programs in aggregate help their patients improve and maintain quality of life, the degree of positive change is substantially related to the presence of wrap-around psychosocial services, with preliminary results suggesting approximately a 30% incremental improvement in self-reported quality of life for those programs with intensive integrated psychosocial (or "wrap-around") services. Additional analyses examine the patterns of wrap-around services that most influence changes in quality of life.


Days Retained in Program by Needs and Drug Abuse

Summary Point 4: Clients in the programs offering psychosocial supports for HIV care tend to have an average of more than five major service vulnerabilities including unstable housing, drug abuse, criminal justice involvement, unemployment, and racial or linguistic barriers to treatment. In spite of high need-vulnerability levels, the clients have voluntarily remained in the psychosocial support programs for, on average, several years. Relatively high-need participants are retained in the SPNS service demonstration models for about as long as lower-need participants.


Retention in Psychosocial Services Based on Case Management

Summary Point 5: Clients in the programs offering psychosocial supports for HIV care tend to have an average of more than five major service vulnerabilities including unstable housing, drug abuse, criminal justice involvement, unemployment, and racial or linguistic barriers to treatment. In spite of high need-vulnerability levels, the clients have voluntarily remained in the psychosocial support programs for, on average, several years. Relatively high-need participants are retained in the SPNS service demonstration models for about as long as lower-need participants. Clients with one or more sessions of active case management have about half the likelihood of leaving the program. Psychosocial service providers have also been able to help their clients avoid increasing feelings of depression or hopelessness about their illness.


Client Satisfaction Based on Type of Project

Summary Point 6: The medical and psychosocial service demonstration models developed have been almost uniformly rated by their participants as "very good" or "excellent" and responsive to participant needs. The level of program satisfaction is not systematically related to behavioral issues or service needs-vulnerabilities, suggesting that the programs are able provide equally satisfactory services for very high need patients with such issues as drug abuse, participation in sex work, criminal justice system involvement, and membership in groups that have traditionally under-accessed services. In addition to overall satisfaction, patients note that they are treated with respect, staff communicate effectively with them, and that they would recommend that their friends access services at the provider. Satisfaction is slightly higher in the programs–Community Based Organization Psychosocial Services, University Comprehensive Healthcare–with wrap-around psychosocial support services or Integrated Care Models as opposed to the Managed HIV/AIDS Care Models.


Results of Follow Up Training Interviews

Summary Point 7: Between 1994 and 1999, the SPNS Cooperative Agreement Projects provided training to almost 10,000 healthcare and related professionals on medical and psychosocial treatment issues in HIV/AIDS care, sensitivity to the needs of special populations, and special technical topics in AIDS care. Six-to-twelve month follow-up interviews with several hundred healthcare professionals who had attended trainings at one of nine projects found that 79% of the respondents said the training had a positive effect on how they provided services to their patients or clients; 82% of the trainees mentioned at least one specific and concrete instance of change in patient care in their program as a direct result of the training experience. As context, the individuals interviewed had had an average of 5.9 years experience working with HIV/AIDS patients, and hence the trainings raised skills and the awareness of new treatment issues significantly among even an experienced group of professionals.

Mean Rating of How Training Affected...


Percent Indicating Training had Positive Effect on...


  Introduction of Triple Combination Therapy

Summary Point 8: Triple combination therapies including protease inhibitors became widely available during the course of these projects. Approximately half of the patients on whom pharmaceutical data are available received triple combination therapy. Access to triple combination therapy or HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) was made to patients irrespective of major demographic and behavioral categories, with the exception of active heroin use (active heroin users were much less likely to receive triple combination therapy). The same rates of triple combination therapy usage were found in Managed Care and University Comprehensive Healthcare (Integrated Care) projects, for men and women, and for racial-ethnic groups.


  Triple Combination Therapy and Change in Medical Indicators Over Time

Summary Point 9: Triple combination therapies including protease inhibitors became widely available during the course of these projects. Approximately half of the patients on whom pharmaceutical data are available received triple combination therapy. Patients who received triple combination therapies had a more pronounced rise in CD4 counts and a sharper decrease in viral loads than did patients who were not known to have received these therapies.


Likelihood of Receiving Services by Time in Program

Summary Point 10: In aggregate, the psychosocial service providers (community based organizations) and providers of integrated medical (and psychosocial) care, have defined a continuum of services that are required for high need individuals who are brought into psychosocial care which supports their medical care. While there are many site-specific variations dependent upon the target population for the project, the overall mission of the agency, and the type of staff employed by the agency, in aggregate the likelihood that various services are required has been defined by these projects. The following charts are fitted statistical curves that show the likelihood that a client will be provided each of seven major types of services by psychosocial service providers and integrated medical care providers as a function of how long the client is in the program. As can be seen, these projects have defined a continuum of care, for an aggregate group of high-need persons living with HIV, in which case management is a necessity; individual and group counseling are highly likely to be needed (and provided) and other services such as counseling to prevent HIV re-transmission and secondary infection are also likely to be needed.

Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received HIV Prevention/Intervention Services for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Individual Counseling Services for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Psychiatric/Psychosocial Assessments for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Group (not Couple) Counseling for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Family/Couple Counseling for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Substance Abuse Services for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Estimated ("Fitted") Probability of Having Received Case Management Services for Participants at Medical and Psychosocial Service Providers as a Function of Days in the Program: Separately by Gender


Change in Self-Rated Quality of Life by Satisfaction with Services

Summary Point 11: Patients who have relatively the most improvement in their quality of life and whose clinicians rate their progress as most improving (or least deteriorating) rate the quality of their programs most highly. Over samples of hundreds of patients, those who had the most change in their self-rated ability to work, enjoy life, and be relatively unaffected by their symptoms were those who were also rated the quality of their programs most highly. It was also true that those patients who clinician rated their functioning as better, or at least stabilized, also rated their programs as of higher quality. The patient ratings of program quality are related to the actual progress of the patient in the programs.

Relationship Between Estimated Change in Quality of Life Over Time (from a Hierarchical Linear Model) and Patient Judgment About Quality of Services (statistically significant relationship; patients who improve most say their program has the highest quality)

Relationship Between Estimated Change in Clinical Karnofsky Severity Rating (from a Hierarchical Linear Model) and Patient Judgment About Quality of Services (statistically significant relationship; patients judged by the clinician to improve most say their program has the highest quality)

 


The following charts show the percentage of individuals rating the services as fair/poor, good, very good, or excellent who improved.

Quality of Life


Karnofsky Severity Rating


  Training Quality Ratings

Summary Point 12: Between 1994 and 1999, the SPNS Cooperative Agreement Projects provided training to almost 10,000 healthcare and related professionals on medical and psychosocial treatment issues in HIV/AIDS care, sensitivity to the needs of special populations, and special technical topics in AIDS care. As shown for 604 trainings below, the average rating of quality for the trainings, on a scale from 1-to-5 was very high.


  Change Over Time in Client Distress

Summary Point 13: Clients in the SPNS treatment programs report significantly decreased levels of psychological distress over the course of their treatment episode. Statistical [HLM] models show that on average self-reported psychological distress decreases significantly over time, and that such gains may be maintained for periods of several years. 


 Change in Client Barriers Over Time

Summary Point 14: Clients in the SPNS treatment programs report significantly decreased levels of perceived barriers to receiving needed care over the course of their treatment episode. Statistical [HLM] models show that on average self-reported perceived barriers to service levels decrease significantly over time, and that such gains may be maintained for periods of several years. 


  Change Over Time in Self-Reported Symptoms

Summary Point 15: Patients in the SPNS treatment programs report significantly decreased levels of self-reported symptoms over the course of their treatment episode. Statistical [HLM] models show that on average self-reported symptom levels decrease significantly over time, and that such gains may be maintained for periods of several years. It is important to note that the changes are self-reported ones.


  Probability of Retaining CD4 Count by Type of Clinic

Summary Point 16: More than half of the patients, with the progressive disease of HIV/AIDS, may be maintained at the same or higher CD4 count for a period of time approaching the maximum in our evaluation study, of about three years. Patients in the Comprehensive Medical Care Programs are the most likely to be maintained. 


 Probability of Maintaining Karnofsky Rating by Type of Clinic

Summary Point 17: Most patients, with the progressive disease of HIV/AIDS, may be maintained at the same or higher level of functioning for a period of time approaching the maximum in our evaluation study, of about three years. Patients in the Comprehensive Medical Care are the most likely to be maintained. 


 Probability of Maintaining Viral Load at or Below Baseline

Summary Point 18: More than half of the patients, with the progressive disease of HIV/AIDS, may be maintained at the same or lower viral load levels for a period of time approaching the maximum in our evaluation study, of about three years. Patients in the both the Managed Medical Care and Comprehensive Medical Care Programs were about equally likely to be maintained for a given period of time. 


Probability of Same or Improved Psychological Distress Level

Summary Point 19: More than half of the clients, with the progressive disease of HIV/AIDS, may be maintained at the same or higher level of psychological functioning for a period of time approaching the maximum in our evaluation study, of about three years.


 Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Gender

Summary Point 20: On most major indicators of outcomes, male and female patients had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[by Gender]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Race-Ethnicity

Summary Point 21: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients from different ethnic-racial groups had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Race-Ethnicity]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Sexual Orientation

Summary Point 22: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing sexual orientations had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Sexual Orientation]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Site Type

Summary Point 23: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients from psychosocial and medical projects had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Site Type]

[Note: Psychosocial Projects did not collect medical indicators.]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Drug Abuse

Summary Point 24: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients non-users of drugs and drug abusers had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[by Drug Abuse Status]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Housing Status

Summary Point 25: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing degrees of housing stability had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[By Housing Status]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Age

Summary Point 26: Non-chance levels of positive outcomes are achieved for the groups of patients aged 21-55 and over 55 years; the fact that the levels are not significantly above chance for the younger group may be more a function of sample size than a lack of positive outcomes.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Age]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Primary Language

Summary Point 27: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with a primary language of English or not-English had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Primary Language]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Childcare Needs

Summary Point 28: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing degrees of childcare needs had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Childcare Needs]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result


 Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Highest Grade Completed

Summary Point 29: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing levels of education had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Highest Grade Completed]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Employment Status

Summary Point 30: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing levels of employment had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Employment Status]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Insurance Coverage

Summary Point 31: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing types of insurance had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Insurance Coverage]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


 Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Alcohol Problem

Summary Point 32: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who did, or did not abuse alcohol, had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Alcohol Problem]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Heroin Use

Summary Point 33: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who did, or did not abuse heroin, had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Heroin Use]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Crack

Summary Point 34: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who did, or did not abuse crack had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Crack Use]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Other Drug Use

Summary Point 35: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who did, or did not abuse other drugs had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Other Drug Use]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Criminal Justice System Involvement

Summary Point 36: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients with differing patterns of criminal justice involvement had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Criminal Justice System Involvement]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Sex Work

Summary Point 37: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients actively in sex work had lower levels of positive outcomes; for individuals actively engaging in sex work, the degree of positive outcomes is significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Sex Work]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Sex with Injection Drug User

Summary Point 38: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who were, or were not sex partners of injection drug users had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Sex with Injection Drug User]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


 Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Dependent Upon Public Supported Medical Services

Summary Point 39: On most major indicators of outcomes, patients who were, and were not dependent on the public medical system had similar levels of positive outcomes, with the degree of positive outcomes significantly above chance levels.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Dependent Upon Public Supported Medical Services]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Medical and Psychosocial Outcomes by Type of Project

Summary Point 40: Overall, the Psychosocial Projects obtained non-chance levels of positive psychosocial outcomes while the medical projects did not do so; for all medical indicators, the medical projects in aggregate achieved non-chance levels of positive outcomes.

Positive Outcomes: Maintained or Enhanced Functioning Over Time in Program
[Type of Project]

The number of patients in each group varies by outcome and may be quite small in some cases. Click on the graphic for the original Knowledge Item to see the number of patients in each category and formal statistical tests that the probability of a positive outcome exceeds chance level (50%). The original Knowledge Item also includes tests of whether the successful outcome rates for each group on each indicator are statistically different from one another.

  • An alternate result, using a different way of defining positive outcome, is also available and generally shows even stronger effects. Click to access the alternate result.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Gender

Summary Point 41: Splitting the overall sample by gender, it was found that for both males and females, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. There was no difference in rated program quality by gender of the patients.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Race-Ethnicity

Summary Point 42: Splitting the overall sample by race-ethnicity, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. African-American patients rated the programs as having a slightly lower quality.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Sexual Orientation

Summary Point 43: Splitting the overall sample by sexual orientation, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. All sexual orientation groups rated the programs with about the same overall quality level.

Click graphic to expand.
Click graphic to expand.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Type of Clinic

Summary Point 44: Splitting the overall sample by type of clinic, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. The University Comprehensive Healthcare (Integrated Care) and Community Based Organization projects were rated as higher in quality by their clients.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Drug Abuse

Summary Point 45: Splitting the overall sample by drug abuse, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Prior users of drugs tended to rate the programs as having slightly lower quality than did either individuals for whom drug use was not identified or for whom there was current drug use.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Housing Status

Summary Point 46: Splitting the overall sample by housing status, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Individuals with unstable housing tended to rate the programs as being of somewhat higher quality.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Age

Summary Point 47: Splitting the overall sample by age, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. There was no difference in rated program quality by the age of the clients.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Primary Language

Summary Point 48: Splitting the overall sample by primary language, it was found that for both groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. There was no difference in rated quality by the primary language of the program participants.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Childcare Needs

Summary Point 49: Splitting the overall sample by childcare needs, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. There was no difference in rated program quality by whether the client needed childcare while in services.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Highest Grade Completed

Summary Point 50: Splitting the overall sample by highest grade completed, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Program satisfaction levels were not related to the highest grade level completed.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Employment Status

Summary Point 51: Splitting the overall sample by employment status, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Program satisfaction was not related to the employment status of the patient.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Insurance Coverage

Summary Point 52: Splitting the overall sample by insurance coverage, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Program satisfaction was related to whether the patient had public insurance; patients without insurance (or with private insurance) rated the programs as higher in quality than did patients with publicly-supported insurance.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Alcohol Problem

Summary Point 53: Splitting the overall sample by alcohol abuse status, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Status as having an alcohol problem was not related to the degree of program satisfaction.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Heroin Use

Summary Point 54: Splitting the overall sample by heroin use, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Current and past heroin abusers had somewhat lower levels of program satisfaction.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Crack Use

Summary Point 55: Splitting the overall sample by crack use, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Program satisfaction was not related to status as a crack user or not.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Other Drug Use

Summary Point 56: Splitting the overall sample by other drug use, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Patients who had not abused "other" drugs had slightly higher levels of program satisfaction.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Criminal Justice System Involvement

Summary Point 57: Splitting the overall sample by criminal justice system involvement, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Patients with prior Criminal Justice System involvement had the lowest levels of rated program satisfaction while patients with current CJS involvement had the highest levels of rated program satisfaction.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Sex Work

Summary Point 58: Splitting the overall sample by sex work, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Program satisfaction levels were not related to status as a sex worker.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Sex with Injection Drug User

Summary Point 59: Splitting the overall sample by sex with injection drug user, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Patients who had formerly been involved with injection drug users had the lowest rated levels of program satisfaction.


Patient-Rated Satisfaction with Services by Dependent Upon Public Supported Medical Services

Summary Point 60: Splitting the overall sample by whether dependent on public supported medical services, it was found that for all groups, significantly more patients rated the program as very good or excellent than would be expected by chance. Status as dependent or not upon the publicly-supported medical system was not related to the degree of rated program satisfaction.

These conclusions are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent official conclusions of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance. Analyses are ongoing, and as new analyses are conducted, some of these summary points may change.

George J. Huba, Ph.D.
Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.
Abigail T. Panter, Ph.D.
November 13, 2009

Suggested Citation: Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., Panter, A. T., and the HRSA/HAB SPNS Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee (1998-2001). Short Summary of Major Cross-Cutting Evaluation Findings from HRSA/HAB's SPNS Cooperative Agreements on Innovative Models of Care, The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care, Online at www.TheMeasurementGroup.com.

Note: Knowledge Items which support the major Summary Points can be reached by clicking on the figures.

Access the entire Knowledge Base from the buttons below.


Patient Outcomes from the Evaluation of the HRSA/HAB/SPNS Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models of HIV/AIDS Care
This presentation summarizes medical and psychosocial outcomes from the 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration [HRSA], HIV/AIDS Bureau [HAB] as Special Projects of National Significance [SPNS] from 1994-1999. Featured are trend and maximum outcomes on measures of patient functioning, including medical (CD4 Count, Karnofsky Severity Rating, and Viral Load) and psychosocial (patient-rated Quality of Life, Symptom Severity, Service Barriers, and Distress Level) indicators. Retention and patient-rated service quality outcomes - disaggregated by service need, vulnerability, and demographic factors - are also included in this presentation.

The following presentation is available in two formats. You may view the presentation in Browser Format with Microsoft Explorer or Netscape Navigator; output is optimized for Explorer. To have the presentation play automatically, click the small icon in lower-right corner of the presentation window. To select individual slides, click on the index in the left frame or the center-bottom arrows. You may also view the presentations in Adobe PDF Format. To download a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader, click here. The Adobe Acrobat version is not animated but has higher resolution and will load faster. Both formats will open the presentation in a new window.

Browser Format PDF Format

 


Navigate the Knowledge Base

bar.gif (856 bytes)

Findings from 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) from 1994-1999. Cross-cutting (multisite) evaluation and Knowledge Base by The Measurement Group. The Evaluation and Dissemination Center was funded from 1994-2001.

"Knowledge generated through program evaluation and applied research."

If a link appears to be broken, please inform TMG at info@TheMeasurementGroup.com.

Large figures and tables in this Knowledge Base fit inside a normal-sized (1024 by 768) screen. To expand these figures and tables, click on them and an expanded graphic will appear inside a new window. Knowledge Items will fit across a printed landscape wide page.

A summary of the major findings in this Knowledge Base has been added to this site and was published in printed form on October 1, 2000. If you wish to receive a printed copy of that volume, click here and give a full mailing address. A full copy of the printed report may be accessed by clicking the Summary Report button on each Knowledge Item.

July 2002: 90% of the projected Knowledge Items are currently online. Knowledge Items are still being enhanced with additional analyses and supplementary results.


Acknowledgments

Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base was designed and authored by G. J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as "Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com." This Knowledge Base has been authored and published by The Measurement Group using results generated in its cross-cutting evaluation studies of the 27 HRSA SPNS Cooperative Agreements. 

Questions or Comments: Contact The Measurement Group.

Use of Knowledge Base Information: Acceptable Uses and Limitations.

Collaborators from Participating Projects: Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee 1999.

Participating Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center were funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) between 1994 and 1999. Click the Model Programs button in any individual Knowledge Item for descriptions of the projects that contributed to the specific Knowledge Item, a list of key staff at the projects, and  grant numbers.

Why This Evaluation was Conducted: Editorial.

More Information: Design of this Knowledge Base.

Recommended Citation Format for Web Materials: American Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.

Work on the Knowledge Base and the cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.


Knowledge Base on Adolescent HIV/AIDS Care


Copyright © 2005 by The Measurement Group LLC. All rights reserved. This may not be current and will not be updated.