I frequently am asked why
programs like the HRSA/HAB/SPNS Projects are evaluated. Why, people wonder,
do we have to ask if these programs produce positive medical outcomes? And,
if we do, shouldn't we use randomized research designs?
It is well established from clinical
trials of new pharmaceuticals that current HIV/AIDS medication regimens,
especially in combination, work to reduce viral load and generally improve
health. Other drugs can act as prophylaxes for opportunistic infections and
these effects have been well established in clinical trials. Do we have to
evaluate programs to establish that these therapies work? To this
question, I would answer, "Not really... much more rigorous and
controlled studies have already established efficacy."
Clinical trials, however, enroll
"eligible" patients and then make sure that they have adhered to
the recommended dosing and its timing for the drug being tested (or the
placebo). Patients are screened for eligibility. Patients who do not adhere
to the protocol may be removed from the pool for whom effects are
established at the time that efficacy is statistically assessed.
Given the complexity of current HIV/AIDS
medication dosing regimens and their reliance on timing and diet, one could
argue, as I would, that perhaps not all individuals with HIV/AIDS will be
able to as rigidly adhere to the treatment regimen as might be required by a
standardized treatment (research) protocol. This might especially be the
case for someone who is unemployed and homeless, abuses drugs, has children
that need care, has mental illness, deals with an abusive partner, or has
just gotten out of the criminal justice system and is distrustful of all
institutions.
As is seen throughout the Online
Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care which documents the relative success of
the HRSA/HAB/SPNS models, the patients served by these real-world projects
are those who might not be represented in clinical trials of HIV/AIDS drugs.
The clients of these SPNS Projects may still use crack (or have stopped very
recently), may be engaging in sex work, may have recently come out of
prison, may have several young children that must be watched while the
patient is in care, may have sex partners or other family members who cannot
be told the patient is HIV seropositive, or may still abuse alcohol repeatedly. The
clients of these SPNS Projects may know little English and be unable to
access services in their native language, they may be much younger or older
than other patients at a program, and they may feel stigmatized because of
their race-ethnicity, sexual orientation, or other behaviors. The clients of
these SPNS Projects may be homeless or precariously housed, often without
access to a refrigerator in which to store medications and a telephone with
which to contact their healthcare provider, and are dependent upon the
public healthcare system. The patients of these SPNS Projects may want to
work (and be medically able to do so) but not have skills that allow them to
keep jobs, or they may be unable to hold a job and obtain medical services
on a regular schedule. The clients of these SPNS Projects are as likely to
be women as men.
The clients of these programs often are
the patients who will be under-represented in clinical trials. The patients
served by these SPNS programs, by the very nature of their needs, behaviors,
demographics, geographic distribution, and other factors may not access
clinical trials as well as other individuals with HIV/AIDS, or they may tend
to be ruled ineligible to participate in these programs.
The SPNS Programs are Special Projects of
National Significance selected by peer review for their ability to provide
state-of-the-art services to members of populations with significant unmet
needs and to produce optimal outcomes.
When we study the outcomes achieved by
these programs, we are establishing the successes that can be expected for
very high-need patients who may not have accessed services in the past, and
whose behaviors, constraints, and vulnerabilities may make it difficult for
them to meet all of the expectations of their healthcare providers unless
supportive services are also provided. Such patients may not feel
comfortable in healthcare centers. They may not understand what they are
being asked to do. And, the requirements of treatment (or their everyday
lives) may unleash a torrent of emotional and social problems.
The SPNS Projects establish a "gold
standard" for the "best" average outcomes that can be
expected for groups of high-need and vulnerable individuals accessing
HIV/AIDS services. The SPNS Projects have demonstrated how to eliminate
disparities in medical and psychosocial outcomes between groups of high-need
and vulnerable individuals and those with fewer vulnerabilities. The results
obtained from these projects go beyond those of the randomized, clinical
trials that established the efficacy of the medical treatments for HIV/AIDS.
The results from these SPNS Projects show the level of outcomes that can be
achieved using state-of-the-art medical treatments with patients who may use
illegal drugs, may have mental illness, have to miss appointments because
their children require care, need transportation to the provider, and who
may be assaulted by a partner because their HIV status becomes known. The
results from these SPNS Projects show how to minimize disparities in medical
outcomes, and indeed maximize those outcomes for all individuals.
The SPNS Projects show us how good
treatment is provided in the real-world of the Ryan White CARE Act Treatment
System which provides services for those individuals who cannot get HIV/AIDS
services elsewhere. The SPNS Projects show us that considerable success can
be obtained in the "treatment system of last resort" if caring,
well-trained healthcare providers and their medical state-of-the-art
treatments are supplemented with psychosocial supports in the language of
the patient, with childcare for young children, with support groups of peers
with HIV/AIDS, with case management, and with substance abuse, mental
health, and counseling services.
The point of evaluating these programs is
to evaluate how well current therapies and systems of care work in the real
world of patients who must use the "treatment system of last
resort" if indeed we can convince them to do so. These therapies work
for high need and vulnerable patients, and programs can be implemented that
minimize disparities in outcomes.