Knowledge Item:
CA-Initiative Impact-14
Overall Recommendations
These recommendations were written by
George J. Huba, Ph.D., Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D., and Abigail T.
Panter, Ph.D., of The Measurement Group, based upon the cumulative
set of findings given in this Online Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS
Care. These recommendations are solely the judgments of the authors
and may not represent the official positions of the Health Resources
and Services Administration, the HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau, or the
grantees who provided data for the cross-cutting evaluation studies.
These recommendations may change substantially as additional
analyses are undertaken or as more results are synthesized.

Check
marks index findings to five major evaluation areas under consideration
by HRSA as they affect the Ryan White CARE Act. Each major evaluation
finding is marked by one or more of these icons to designate questions
that the results may inform, based on the judgment of the authors of
these recommendations.
Traditionally Underserved and Vulnerable Populations
a.
Persons
seeking HIV/AIDS care have varying levels of need-vulnerability.
State-of-the-art programs designed for individuals not currently linked to
services will increasingly find that prospective patients arrive at their
facilities with diverse needs and vulnerabilities. These needs and
vulnerabilities will include being young or old, not speaking English,
having children who need care while the patient receives services, being
from a community of color, not having insurance, lacking stable housing,
being involved with the criminal justice system, being unemployed, not
having an extensive formal education, having a history of substance abuse
(including alcohol, heroin, crack cocaine, and other drugs), being a sex
partner of a drug injector, and engaging in sex work.
|

|
Recommendation
on Matching Services to Needs:
It is recommended that HIV/AIDS programs conduct a comprehensive
assessment of all new patients (or clients) and have a firm plan in
place for providing a full continuum of needed services either in the
program or through a tightly-linked network of agencies to which the
patient is referred. If the patient is referred to an outside agency for
services, it is further recommended that there be strong communication
mechanisms in place – perhaps in the form of an experienced service
advocate or case manager – because integrated medical and psychosocial
services yield the best overall outcomes for the patient.
|
v
v
v
v
v
b.
Innovative
HIV/AIDS service models achieve positive outcomes with high-need
populations.
Literally hundreds of different analyses of the Cooperative Agreement
evaluation data show that in these state-of-the-art service models,
favorable medical and psychosocial outcomes can be achieved for relatively
high-need and vulnerable populations that are comparable to those achieved
for groups with fewer manifest needs. Result after result suggests that
gaps in program outcomes between different groups of individuals living
with HIV may be minimized by enriching the HIV-services continuum to be
comprehensive, integrated within the same facility (or tightly linked),
and utilizing services which are gender-, cultural or ethnic-, and
behavior-appropriate and sensitive.
|


|
Recommendation
on Outcomes Assessment to Eliminate Disparities:
Given that these evaluation results suggest that comparable, favorable outcomes
can be obtained for high need-vulnerability groups, it is recommended that
provider agencies develop integrated service plans to serve individuals with
different constellations of need, either within the program or through
tightly-linked referrals. Additionally, it is recommended that a continuing
process of reviewing outcomes for different groups be implemented to assure
quality and constant improvement. Individual service provider agencies should
have plans in place for meeting the comprehensive service needs of all HIV/AIDS
patients who present themselves at the agency and for assessing possible
disparities in outcomes for different groups that may emerge so that such gaps
may be minimized and eventually eliminated.
|
v
v
v
v
v
c.
Comprehensive,
integrated service models improve patient health and well-being.
Higher-need individuals benefit from enriched programs that include case
management, social supports, outpatient substance abuse services,
transportation and accompaniment, outpatient mental health services, peer
counseling, child care, and medication adherence programs. When the unique
needs of an individual can be met within a comprehensive facility, that
individual’s medical and psychosocial outcomes are greatly enhanced.
Medical needs were only one of many cited by patients as being unmet at
the time they enrolled into these model programs. Programs found it
necessary to provide many types of services to these high-need patients.
|



|
Recommendation
on Comprehensive Needs Assessments:
It is recommended that the “gate-keeper” agency in each service
continuum, or the agency at which the patient first presents for
services, should have the capacity for, and the regular practice of,
providing a comprehensive needs assessment for all individuals
presenting for HIV/AIDS services. This comprehensive needs assessment
should be available to all agencies that work with the patient, and an
integrated service plan, spanning agencies, should be developed and
carefully coordinated.
|
v
v
v
v
v
d.
Community
Based Organizations play a key role in the continuum of care.
Small, population-targeted Community Based Organizations (CBOs) appear to
be the most successful at recruiting high-need groups into the HIV/AIDS
service system. Such organizations represent a key part of the overall
services continuum because they tend to maximize the access of certain
groups (e.g., ethnic-racial minorities, women, substance abusers,
individuals from correctional settings, individuals with concurrent
behavioral issues) into the system of care. Programs of the CBOs and of
those medical facilities with tightly-integrated, CBO-like psychosocial
services are perceived by their clients in a way that is somewhat more
favorable than are those of medical programs with fewer integrated
psychosocial services. High-need clients who receive CBO and integrated
medical-psychosocial services also report that their quality of life is
more likely to improve throughout the treatment episode.
|



|
Recommendation
on Role of Community Based Organizations in the Continuum of Care:
It is recommended that in any larger network of services, it is
important to include population-targeted Community Based Organizations
that can recruit and support high-need and vulnerable individuals with a
variety of psychosocial services so that overall quality of life is
enhanced and other health and psychosocial outcomes are maximized. CBOs
that target defined groups with similar behavioral, cultural, or gender
issues appear to be especially effective.
|
v
v
v
v
v
Removing Barriers to Care
e. The
Cooperative Agreement Projects successfully reduced barriers to care.
Evaluation studies of the Cooperative Agreement Projects suggest that
barriers to obtaining a full array of needed services were ameliorated by
participating in these state-of-the-art service projects and that medical
and psychosocial outcomes were maximized as a result.
|
 |
Recommendation
on Barrier Reduction: It is recommended that all HIV/AIDS
agencies (whether primarily medical or psychosocial) have capacity for
assessing barriers to receiving HIV/AIDS services as perceived by
potential patients. Services should be provided internally or through
tightly linked referrals to help remove those barriers. Such services
might include case management and other kinds of treatment advocacy, as
well as education on accessing care. It is important to realize that
patient-perceived barriers may be both structural (such as a lack of
knowledge about services, an inability to pay, non-enrollment in
entitlement programs, or a lack of transportation to services) and
interpersonal-social (such as an unwillingness to disclose HIV status,
needing to care for children or a partner, or fear of rejection by
family). Removing interpersonal-social barriers may require a richer mix
of services than is required for removing structural barriers.
|
v
v
v
v
v
f.
Population-specific
programs are especially successful in reducing barriers for their clients.
Agencies that know the unique barriers encountered by specific types of
individuals – such as agencies targeting a particular ethnic-racial,
stigmatized, or disenfranchised group – are particularly effective at
addressing such roadblocks to accessing quality care.
|

|
Recommendation
on Population-Specific Programs:
It is recommended that the overall service continuum includes agencies
with target populations that have traditionally faced specific barriers
to care. Such agencies play an unique and fundamental role in the
overall services continuum to ensure that specific barriers are
eliminated, patients are enrolled and retained in needed services, and
health and psychosocial outcomes are maximized. Both perceived
structural and interpersonal-social barriers to care may be somewhat
different for groups with specific behavioral, cultural-racial, and
gender issues; service providers from those groups may be especially
helpful in removing the barriers.
|
v
v
v
v
v
g.
Outreach
is critical in recruiting traditionally underserved persons with HIV/AIDS
into care.
An important strategy for improving access to state-of-the-art programs
such as those provided by the Cooperative Agreement Projects is to engage
in active outreach to traditionally underserved groups using staff who
either are from those groups or are professional specialists in the needs
and issues of specific groups. Many possible methods of outreach can be
effective in linking individuals to care: the Cooperative Agreement
Projects collectively used a number of methods including street outreach,
linkages to other HIV/AIDS agencies, linkages to other human service
agencies that might have clients with HIV/AIDS (such as the criminal
justice, substance abuse, and mental health systems), and recruitment of
the sex partners, drug-using partners, and friends of current patients.
|

|
Recommendation
on Outreach:
It is recommended that each HIV/AIDS service agency, whether internally
or through tightly-linked collaboration with other agencies, have the
capacity for both street and agency outreach to ensure that the highest
need clients are given equal access to care. Agencies that do not use
such active outreach strategies may not include the most vulnerable
groups in their treatment populations.
|
v
v
v
v
v
h. Ongoing
community input is important for continuous quality improvement of
HIV/AIDS services. Many of the Cooperative Agreement Projects
undertook assessments for continuous quality improvement – through
methods as varied as surveying active and potential patients, conducting
focus groups with current and former patients, consulting with consumer
advisory bodies, and surveying independent professionals. As a result,
they were able to tune their service models to be maximally responsive to
the needs of their target populations.
|



|
Recommendation
on Assessments of Local System: As part of ongoing continuous
quality improvement mechanisms, it is recommended that periodic
assessments of barriers to care should be performed to identify any new
or emerging issues that might prevent full access to high-quality
HIV/AIDS services by patients. Similarly, it is recommended that a
regular review of feedback from key stakeholders in local HIV/AIDS
service systems be encouraged to ensure the relevance and responsiveness
of these programs to their communities.
|
v
v
v
v
v
Optimizing Delivery Systems
i. Ongoing
planning is a key element in optimizing services for local needs. A
number of the Cooperative Agreement Projects engaged in formal planning
processes to tailor their service models to local unmet needs and other
local issues. For instance, three University Medical School programs
engaged in long-term planning processes to implement comprehensive and
integrated care models within traditional medical school programs. Other
projects spent several years planning and negotiating HIV/AIDS managed
care delivery systems. Still other projects enhanced specific portions of
the HIV/AIDS medical delivery systems in the District of Columbia, South
Texas, Chicago, Brooklyn, Kansas City, and St. Louis using systematic and
long-term planning processes. The planning process yielded
locally-optimized services for high-need and vulnerable populations likely
to have been historically underserved in those communities.
|



|
Recommendation on Ongoing Planning:
It is recommended that comprehensive service planning models be part of
continuing Ryan White CARE Act activities, because the services produced through
comprehensive planning efforts lead to enhanced service networks with
demonstrated positive outcomes for high-need and vulnerable groups. The effect
of planning that involves key stakeholders is to provide a more comprehensive
and integrated service system.
|
v
v
v
v
v
j. Training
is an important mechanism for effecting change in HIV/AIDS service
systems. Training was used by many of the Cooperative Agreement
Projects to optimize local service delivery systems. The majority of
healthcare providers who received training from these projects reported
that they implemented specific changes in their clinical services as a
result of the training. Because the state-of-the-art in HIV/AIDS services
continues to evolve at a rapid pace and there is a sustained influx of new
providers, it is important to maintain such training and continuing
education efforts. Furthermore, within these projects, trainees found a
focus on high-need and vulnerable groups to be a particularly valuable
element that permitted them to improve their own clinical services.
|

|
Recommendation
on Training to Disseminate Treatment Information: It is
recommended that opportunities for training on state-of-the-art
comprehensive HIV/AIDS treatment to high-need and vulnerable groups be
made available on a recurring basis to all Ryan White CARE Act agencies.
It is further recommended that such training activities use the
modalities shown to be especially effective by the Cooperative Agreement
grantees and that all major training initiatives address special issues
related to HIV/AIDS treatment among high-need and vulnerable groups.
|
v
v
v
v
v
k. Mechanisms
for sharing among grantees help enhance and disseminate model programs.
A key part of the Cooperative Agreement process was that representatives
of 27 very diverse projects developing innovative service models met
quarterly for five years to listen to one another’s service experiences
and program outcomes. As a result, there was significant
cross-fertilization of programs in that medical providers added
psychosocial service elements, psychosocial service providers learned how
to link more effectively with medical providers, and trainers were able to
utilize both kinds of experience in educational settings. Program
Directors actively helped one another solve local problems in service
delivery and provided expertise and consultation to one another.
|

|
Recommendation
on Model Dissemination: It is recommended that a number of local
forums be established for Ryan White CARE Act funded service providers to meet
on a regular basis and share service delivery experiences. To be maximally
effective, it is further recommended that processes be developed in which
medical and psychosocial service providers are co-equal partners in such
information-sharing and cross-training activities and that methods be explored
for ensuring candid discussions of major treatment issues. HRSA may wish to
develop a generalized set of technical assistance materials and curricula for
local groups about how to institute and maintain such a process.
|
v
v
v
v
v
Providing Quality Care
l. Standards
of HIV/AIDS care were met or exceeded by the Cooperative Agreement
Projects. Patients treated within the Cooperative Agreement Projects
received care that met or exceeded Public Health Service (PHS) standards.
Many programs in the cross-cutting evaluation received service funds from
a number of different sources so that greatly enhanced programs could be
provided. Case management was provided to more than 90 percent of the
patients. Triple combination drug therapies were provided to eligible
patients. The Cooperative Agreement Projects demonstrated that
state-of-the-art services could be successfully provided to individuals
with many behavioral comorbidities and vulnerabilities. As a result,
comparable outcomes were demonstrated for most groups defined by their
service needs and vulnerabilities.
|
 |
Recommendation on Outcomes for Specific Groups:
It is recommended that all HIV/AIDS providers funded by the Ryan White CARE Act
be asked to formally assess the degree to which their services meet PHS
guidelines and the degree to which the services provided to different need and
vulnerability groups are comparable. Should disparities exist in the services
provided to various groups, it is recommended that a remediation plan be
developed.
|
v
v
v
v
v
m. “Wrap-around”
psychosocial supports improve outcomes for HIV/AIDS patients. Patients
in care from the Cooperative Agreement Projects received “wrap-around”
psychosocial and support services that were designed for people of their
ethnic-racial group and gender and were sensitive to their needs in other
ways. Most programs were designed to be flexible so as to engage and
retain individuals who had not been tightly connected to the service
system. Very high-need patients could be retained in psychosocial support
services as long as individuals with fewer needs and vulnerabilities. Case
managed patients were more likely to stay in treatment and to move more
quickly into other services. Linkages were enhanced by active patient
management, and disparities in access to care were resolved through
optimized programs.
|
|
Recommendation
on Standards for Psychosocial Care: In aggregate, the
Cooperative Agreement psychosocial service providers have defined a
state-of-the-art for HIV/AIDS “wrap-around” psychosocial support
services that tend to minimize differences in outcomes among groups with
different needs and vulnerabilities. It is recommended that a formal
continuum of such services be developed. It is further recommended that
HRSA and/or the Public Health Service develop standards for psychosocial
supports provided to individuals living with HIV/AIDS and that such
standards have the same degree of comprehensiveness and detail as the
current standards for medical care. Such standards should also recognize
that groups with different needs (women, current and recovering drug
abusers, ethnic-racial groups) may require different constellations of
psychosocial services.
|
v
v
v
v
v
n. Health
and quality of life improved for patients of the Cooperative Agreement
Projects. As a result of both state-of-the-art medical care and
sensitive-appropriate “wrap-around” psychosocial services, medical
indicators, patient-rated quality of life, psychological distress, and
patient-rated symptom severity all improved. The improvement was strongest
in those cases where medical and psychosocial services were most tightly
integrated.
|
|
Recommendation
on Priority for Integrated Care:
It is recommended that the tightest possible integration of psychosocial
and medical services be a very high priority for HIV/AIDS service
systems supported by the Ryan White CARE Act. Such integration of
services should be a priority independent of the funding model used and
can be achieved in a number of ways including “one-stop shopping,”
tightly-linked independent service providers, and hybrid models.
|
v
v
v
v
v
Adapting to Change
o. Flexibility
is crucial for ensuring that programs stay at the forefront of HIV/AIDS
care. During the Cooperative Agreement process, there were significant
advances in the medical treatments available for HIV/AIDS (e.g.,
combination antiretroviral therapies, viral load testing). In addition,
there was an increasing recognition that comprehensive psychosocial
supports were necessary, a changing population of newly-diagnosed HIV/AIDS
patients, and numerous opportunities for supplemental funding to the
programs. Between 1994 and 1999, great advances were made throughout the
medical and psychosocial services systems that helped the programs
evaluated here improve services, as well as develop additional program
components that were co-funded through other sources. New standards and
protocols were adopted in such areas as HIV/AIDS treatment, opportunistic
infection prophylaxis, and perinatal transmission of HIV. The programs did
not remain stable over the course of this funding initiative, and in fact
many evolved to accommodate larger populations of higher-need patients
with an enriched and expanded continuum of services. Flexibility is
critical for creating and fine-tuning innovative programs that are, and
remain, responsive to the needs of their target populations and stay on
the cutting edge of new service delivery developments.
|


|
Recommendation on Flexibility in Implementing Treatment Models:
It is recommended that flexibility in adding program components – achieved by
tuning existing services through continuous quality improvement and utilizing
outcome data in support of quality assurance and improvement – be formally
recognized as part of the state-of-the-art for HIV/AIDS services and that
continuing flexibility be recognized as a high priority for Ryan White CARE Act
funded programs. Programs should be encouraged to allocate parts of their
budgets for the activities of data collection, quality assurance, and quality
improvement. Additionally, flexibility should be a key part of future
demonstration project initiatives.
|
v
v
v
v
v
p. Scarce
treatment resources may place funding for services other than those for
direct medical care in jeopardy. Funding and reimbursement mechanisms
are constantly changing, affecting HIV/AIDS care programs on a daily
basis. One challenge faced by many of the Cooperative Agreement Projects
– ironically, in light of the many findings that illustrate the benefits
of the comprehensive continuum of care – is that “wrap-around”
services may be those most likely to be cut in light of scarce resources.
The findings of the Cooperative Agreement Projects highlight the critical
importance of continuing to fund and encourage the implementation of such
linked psychosocial supports for high-need and vulnerable populations.
Similarly, provider training and education were demonstrated to have a
measurable impact on the provision of integrated and comprehensive
HIV/AIDS care. Although not direct clinical services, continuing
professional educational opportunities and other capacity-building
activities serve to improve the state-of-the-art for HIV/AIDS care.
|


|
Recommendation
on New or Enhanced Partnerships: It is recommended that the entire
medical and psychosocial continuum of care be provided to HIV/AIDS patients
either directly through the continuing priorities of the Ryan White CARE Act or
through new/expanded partnerships between agencies primarily charged with the
medical care of HIV/AIDS patients (such as HRSA at the federal level and state
and local health departments) and those charged with the psychosocial care of
populations such as substance abusers, those involved with the criminal justice
system, or those with mental illness (such as SAMHSA at the federal level and
state and local departments of drug treatment, mental health, and probation).
Training is also needed to educate providers on the complete continuum of care,
and such training may be provided through similar partnerships.
|
v
v
v
v
v
q. Advances
in the medical treatment of HIV/AIDS may shift resources from other needed
components of care. With the advent of highly active antiretroviral
therapy (HAART) and related medical treatments, some providers and policy
makers have been inclined to focus resources primarily on access to these
pharmaceutical treatments, to the possible exclusion of other services
within the continuum of care. Access to state-of-the-art medical
treatments is critically important to continue the advances in HIV/AIDS
care of recent years. The results of the evaluations of the Cooperative
Agreement Projects clearly show that use of combination therapies improved
patient outcomes. However, beyond these innovative demonstration projects,
access to these drugs may still be limited in many settings. Even where
access is available, not all patients are able to tolerate or adhere to
the therapies equally, and many patients are in dire need of services in
addition to those that reduce their viral load.
|


|
Recommendation
on Integrated Care in Times of Scarce Resources: It is recommended
that a tightly-linked continuum of integrated psychosocial services be provided
– if indicated – to all patients receiving HAART or other complex medical
therapies under the Ryan White CARE Act to insure adherence to the requirements
of the treatments, and to promote outcomes beyond those indicated by the
straightforward reduction of viral load.
|
v
v
v
v
v
r. Funding
and reimbursement strategies may have an ultimate impact on patient
outcomes.
Alternate types of healthcare funding have been explored by the
Cooperative Agreement Projects. As illustrated throughout the
cross-cutting evaluation results, a continuum of care that includes
“wrap-around” psychosocial supports is likely to produce better
patient outcomes, especially when desirable patient outcomes are viewed
more broadly than as simply changes in laboratory test values.
|


|
Recommendation
on Integrated-Comprehensive and Managed Care:
Given the importance of integrated medical and psychosocial services for
achieving favorable patient outcomes, it appears important that alternate
healthcare financing (or managed care) models be developed that include both
medical and psychosocial support services as core components in the managed care
plan. Economies achieved by limiting services to purely medical ones may
significantly limit patient outcomes. Furthermore, because smaller Community
Based Organizations are especially successful in providing “wrap-around”
psychosocial services that are especially sensitive and appropriate for
high-need and vulnerable populations, such agencies should be given the
opportunity to participate in the service continuum developed under alternate
funding methods.
|
v
v
v
v
v
s. Ongoing
provider training makes the most of the HIV/AIDS treatment system. The
complexity of HIV/AIDS medical and psychosocial treatment continues to
grow. Issues of sensitivity to the treatment populations potentially
multiply as new (often disenfranchised) groups enter the treatment
population in greater numbers. At the same time, there have been strides
in information technology and knowledge dissemination during the same
periods that HIV/AIDS treatments have been enhanced. Better training
methods can lead to a more sophisticated cadre of healthcare providers
able to use new therapies with “behaviorally difficult” groups. Such
training methods can include online training modules, interactive video,
teleconferences, and other ways of linking geographically separated
specialists together to the mutual benefit of the patients of these
providers.
|

|
Recommendation
on Ongoing Training on Integrated Care: It is recommended that there
be continuing efforts to assess and improve methods for training healthcare
providers about HIV/AIDS issues and that such training opportunities more fully
focus on the integration of medical and psychosocial care. Furthermore, to
increase the dissemination of this knowledge widely and into potentially
geographically isolated areas, new technologies should be fully exploited.
|
v
v
v
v
v
t. The
systematic collection of information about the projects through evaluation
permitted the services to be optimized as patient outcomes were assessed. Working
with high-need and vulnerable populations requires that many different
patient issues be addressed. There is a need to share this information
among service providers. A formal data system can provide one way of
sharing this information. Furthermore, the Cooperative Agreement Projects
demonstrated that it is important to monitor the outcomes that are being
achieved within the program and related agencies and to determine whether
there are disparities among the outcomes achieved for individuals from
different groups. The use of systematic evaluation data documenting the
needs of program participants, the services they receive, and their
outcomes permits the program to be tuned to achieve optimal results for an
increasingly diverse patient population.
|

|
Recommendation
on the Collection of Standardized Outcome Measures: It is
recommended that there be continuing efforts to collect data
systematically about patient outcomes within Ryan White CARE Act funded
programs. Additionally, the outcomes of infrastructure development and
training programs should be captured and further evaluated for their
long-term impact upon patient care. It is further recommended that
certain methods for coding service units, patient characteristics, and
outcomes be standardized across Ryan White CARE Act grantees and
providers so that data from different treatment models can be pooled to
determine collective outcomes. Conceptually redundant data systems
currently required for different funders of services should be
consolidated and streamlined as much as possible.
|
Last Updated:
March 25, 2005; data through June 15, 1999; analyses conducted
January 2001.
|
Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base and
this Knowledge Item were designed and authored by G.
J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as
"Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS
Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com."
Questions or
Comments:
Contact The Measurement
Group.
Use of Knowledge Base
Information: Acceptable Uses and
Limitations.
Collaborators from
Participating Projects: Cooperative
Agreement Steering Committee 1999.
Participating
Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on
the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models
of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center
which produced this Knowledge Base were funded by the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS)
between 1994 and 1999. Click the Model Programs button
above for descriptions of the projects that contributed to this specific
Knowledge Item, a list of
key staff, and project grant numbers.
Why This Evaluation was
Conducted: Editorial.
More Information: Design
of this Knowledge Base.
Recommended Citation
Format for Web Materials: American
Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.
Work on the Knowledge Base and the
cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance
(SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are
solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official
views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance
nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose
projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.
|
Copyright © 2005 by The Measurement
Group LLC. All rights reserved. This may not be current and will not be updated.
|
|