Knowledge Item:
CA-Medical Outcomes-12
Length of Time a Participant is Maintained at the
Same or an Improved Quality of Life as a Function of the Type of
Medical Project Providing Treatment
This Knowledge Item is a
follow-up to Knowledge
Item: CA-Quality of Life-50 and Knowledge
Item: CA-Quality of Life-51 which also present data on the days
that quality of life is maintained for a third group of projects,
Community Based Organizations, that provide psychosocial services with
linkages to medical care. This Knowledge Item follows up on the earlier
work by explicitly controlling for the clients stage of HIV disease, as
measured by a control factor of the earliest known CD4 count, and the
classification of factor as to whether the client had an AIDS-defining
condition during the course of the treatment episode. Since the CBO
projects did not collect data on medical test results or opportunistic
infections, their data is not used here. The data from one project
(with 38 patients) were not included in these analyses because that
project explicitly targeted AIDS patients at the
end of their lives by providing home healthcare under a managed care
model, and it was believed that the data from that project would skew the
results for the Managed Care projects.
The probability of maintaining an
individual at or above the baseline Total Quality of Life Score was
estimated from a Cox (proportional
hazards) regression or survival analysis. Initial levels of quality of
life and initial levels of physical functioning (as measured by CD4
count) were controlled.
More than half of the
individuals, in this progressive disease, may be maintained at the same
or higher quality of life for a period of time approaching the maximum
in our evaluation study, of about three years. Different rates of
maintaining patients at full, 90%, and 80% quality of life are found
for Managed Care projects not utilizing wrap-around psychosocial
services and University-based Comprehensive Healthcare programs that
do utilize wrap-around psychosocial services.
Further analyses given in
Knowledge Items: CA-Quality
of Life and Health-37, -42,
-43,
-50,
-51, and
-39,
as well as Knowledge
Items: CA-Medical Outcomes-11 and
-13 show additional analyses that confirm that the projects with
wrap-around comprehensive psychosocial services, supplementing basic
medical services, tend to maintain the patient at the same or an
increased quality of life for a longer time, and with a greater ratio
of improvement, than just medical services. The additional Knowledge
Items use alternate statistical designs and models with different
factors "controlled," but the different methods of assessing
the relative effectiveness of these different types of service models
in achieving improved quality of life for the patients all point out
the importance of integrated psychosocial or "wrap-around"
services.

Click graphic to
expand. (IE 6 users may also have to click the graphic expansion button in the new window.)

Click graphic to
expand. (IE 6 users may also have to click the graphic expansion button in the new window.)

More Information:
CHAID and CHAID Diagram
Note: The CD4 categories
used here are based on the 1993
guidelines published in MMWR on December 18, 1992 for the three
categories of CD4 of 500 or more, 200 - 499, and less than 200. The
latter category has been further differentiated by adding a category of
CD4 < 50 because of the clinical utility of this category for
clinical decisions (see Bartlett's Medical
Management of HIV Infection). The CD4 classifications are based
on a test made on the same date; unlike the classifications used in some
clinical trials and CDC publications, the values given are not nadir
(minimum lifetime) values.
In interpreting this
Knowledge Item, and all others in this section on Medical Outcomes, remember that the ratings of quality of life, symptom
impact, and healthcare utilization are based on patient self reports
unless noted otherwise.
Knowledge Item Citation: Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., Panter, A. T., and the HRSA/HAB SPNS Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee (1998-2001). Knowledge Item:
CA-Medical Outcomes-12 from
HRSA/HAB's SPNS Cooperative Agreements on Innovative Models of Care, The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care, Online at www.TheMeasurementGroup.com.

Last Updated:
March 25, 2005; data through June 15,
1999; analyses conducted March - November 2000.

|
Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base and
this Knowledge Item were designed and authored by G.
J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as
"Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS
Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com."
Questions or
Comments:
Contact The Measurement
Group.
Use of Knowledge Base
Information: Acceptable Uses and
Limitations.
Collaborators from
Participating Projects: Cooperative
Agreement Steering Committee 1999.
Participating
Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on
the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models
of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center
which produced this Knowledge Base were funded by the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS)
between 1994 and 1999. Click the Model Programs button
above for descriptions of the projects that contributed to this specific
Knowledge Item, a list of
key staff, and project grant numbers.
Why This Evaluation was
Conducted: Editorial.
More Information: Design
of this Knowledge Base.
Recommended Citation
Format for Web Materials: American
Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.
Work on the Knowledge Base and the
cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance
(SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are
solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official
views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance
nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose
projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.
|
© Copyright 2005 by The Measurement
Group LLC. All rights reserved.
|
|