Knowledge Item: CA-Medical Outcomes-49
Viral Load Outcomes and Type of Project
Viral loads
outcomes are examined to determine how many patients had clinically
significant reductions in viral load as a function of participation in
the Cooperative Agreement Projects.
Using as a
criterion for success that the patient's viral load decreased at least
.3 log units from the baseline assessment or that the viral load was
undetectable at follow-up at the limit of the testing procedures
equated across projects, 72.4 percent of the male patients and 60.2
percent of the female patients were found to have a clinically
significant reduction in their viral load.
Using as a
criterion for success that the patient's viral load decreased at least
.5 log units from the baseline assessment or that the viral load was
undetectable at follow-up at the limit of the testing procedures
equated across projects, 70.6 percent of the male patients and 55.9
percent of the female patients were found to have a clinically
significant reduction in their viral load.
While
there was not a statistically significant difference for female
patients among the outcome rates obtained in two different types of
clinics, there was a statistically significant difference for males.
The following CHAIDs show results for five sites assessing Viral Load using the PCR
method only (n = 513).




More Information:
CHAID and CHAID Diagram
The
definition of outcome used in this Knowledge Item is based on the
medical literature and the attempt to define what is considered a
clinically significant outcome for a single patient in treatment. Note
that a successful outcome is coded if the patient meets the medical
criterion for positive change in health status at least one time during
the course of the treatment episode. Other Knowledge Items (for example:
Knowledge Item: CA-Medical Outcomes-14,
-15, -18,
-19, -22,
-23) use a technique called Hierarchical Linear Modeling
(HLM) which codes outcome as the overall trend in the patient's scores
through the observed treatment episode. The HLM definition of a
successful outcome is a stringent one that assumes that there is not a relapse, while the current definition acknowledges that in a progressive
disease such as HIV/AIDS, there may be relapse to the baseline state
even after a positive response to therapy.
A related set of results
using an alternate definition of medical outcome is presented in Knowledge
Item: CA-Medical Outcomes-22.
Knowledge Item Citation: Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., Panter, A. T., and the HRSA/HAB SPNS Cooperative Agreement Steering Committee (1998-2001). Knowledge Item: CA-Medical Outcomes-49 from
HRSA/HAB's SPNS Cooperative Agreements on Innovative Models of Care, The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS Care, Online at
www.TheMeasurementGroup.com.

Last Updated:
March 25, 2005; data through
June 15,
1999; analyses conducted November 2000.

|
Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base and
this Knowledge Item were designed and authored by G.
J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as
"Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS
Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com."
Questions or
Comments:
Contact The Measurement
Group.
Use of Knowledge Base
Information: Acceptable Uses and
Limitations.
Collaborators from
Participating Projects: Cooperative
Agreement Steering Committee 1999.
Participating
Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on
the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models
of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center
which produced this Knowledge Base were funded by the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS)
between 1994 and 1999. Click the Model Programs button
above for descriptions of the projects that contributed to this specific
Knowledge Item, a list of
key staff, and project grant numbers.
Why This Evaluation was
Conducted: Editorial.
More Information: Design
of this Knowledge Base.
Recommended Citation
Format for Web Materials: American
Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.
Work on the Knowledge Base and the
cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance
(SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are
solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official
views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance
nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose
projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.
|
© Copyright 2005 by The Measurement
Group LLC. All rights reserved.
|
|