|
Knowledge
Item: CA-Initiative Impact-99S
Major
Achievements and Lessons Learned: 1994-1999
University of Nevada
School of Medicine
The
University of Nevada School of Medicine project has prevented or
slowed wasting syndrome experienced by individuals living with
HIV/AIDS.
In 1999, the Evaluation and Dissemination Center
asked each project to state its major achievements and the lessons it had
learned from conducting the project. Those stated achievements and lessons
learned are reproduced here (with minor editing) as reported to the Evaluation and Dissemination Center. The summary statements given here are those aspects of the program's experiences that the Project Director wished to emphasize.

| Achievement
1: Protocols
and procedures for providing nutrition assessment and counseling
services have been developed. |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
a)
Flexible, creative nutrition staff and clients who were
understanding and patient and who allowed for and facilitated
continual change and experimentation with new ideas and procedures.
b)
Access to new ideas and latest research via national and
international nutrition networks (formal and informal), HIV
conferences, Internet, etc.
c)
Cooperative work with medical care
providers to keep nutrition practices relevant and current with
medical advances.
d)
Staff experience in other relevant
nutrition subspecialty areas that allowed for crossover and testing
of ideas/practices/materials in HIV/AIDS.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
There
are gray areas in this field with no clear answers or proven
procedures. Often, it was necessary to just guess about what might
work, try it, and make changes if something wasn't working well.
Staffing schedules are somewhat staggered to accommodate needs of
the clinic, clients, and staff (students), and communication about
changes in procedures was not always timely or clear resulting in
confusion and inconsistency in procedures.
|
Factors
that Ensured
Success:
Efforts
were made to keep up with most current findings and to be involved at
the national level with other HIV nutrition leaders. Team members of
the nutrition project worked cooperatively towards a common goal,
adapted well to change, and kept the well being of clients as the
overarching goals. A change in administration and staff of the medical
clinic increased support for nutrition services for clients and made
the environment friendly and cooperative.
|
| Achievement
2: Nutrition
services have become integrated into routine services available to
clients. |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
Scientific
data support the importance of good nutrition in disease management
in general and in HIV in particular providing the rationale for
inclusion of nutrition services in HIV care. The larger HIV
client/consumer culture encourages, advocates for and supports the
inclusion of nutrition services as part of quality care.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
The
early medical clinic environment (both attitudinal and physical)
presented barriers to fully implementing this project. The location,
leadership, and administration of the medical clinic in which our
project operates changed about mid-way through the 5 years, and many
things had to be put on hold during the transition phase. The
physical location of our project as moved three times, and we
continue to have to adjust where we see clients (including moving
equipment, staff, materials) creating some stress and confusion for
both clients and staff.
|
Factors that Ensured
Success:
There
was support for the project at the highest levels both from the
administrators and medical director. Nutrition project
staff were willing to be accommodating and patient with change and
had interpersonal skills to deal with conflict and non-cooperation
from earlier clinic nursing staff. |
| Achievement
3: There
is a financial commitment to continue to fund nutrition services
after completion of this SPNS project. ("Buy-in" has been
achieved). |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
The
clinic (Board members, administrator, medical director, and staff)
is committed to providing comprehensive, quality care. Nutrition
services are viewed as part of the package, and have received
support from clients. Relative to other types of HIV care, nutrition
services are inexpensive.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
None
listed.
|
Factors that Ensured
Success:
The
temporary nature of the SPNS project as a demonstration and pilot
has been stressed throughout the 5 years, and clients and community
agencies have periodically been reminded of the need for the
community to carry on nutrition services.
|
| Achievement
4: A mechanism (nutrition risk screening form) has been developed to
identify and respond to the nutrition need of clients. |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
Trained
nutrition staff have focused efforts on identifying and
"cataloging" the broad spectrum of factors that impact on
nutrition needs using both questionnaire and interview methods.
Periodic examination of these data have allowed for continual
updating of factors to be screened for. Clear goal for eventual
transition of nutrition screening from just SPNS clients to all
clinic clients allowed for development of "user and
clinic-friendly" format.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
Hectic
clinic schedule and almost continual transition, growth, and change
in location, personnel, and scope of services divert attention from
nutrition activities and limit staff willingness to take on any new
responsibilities. Difficulties have been encountered in implementing the screening system
for clients who are well-established in care versus those who are
new to care.
|
Factors that Ensured
Success:
There
was an understanding
on the part of the staff that early identification and treatment of
nutrition problems results in better patient outcomes. Involvement
of entire staff in the development, testing, and refinement of a simple screening form and in deciding how to utilize and implement a
screening system helped gain acceptance.
|
| Achievement
5: A
system has been developed to collect both quantitative and
qualitative data that allow for continual program evaluation and
redesign when necessary. |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
Project
investigators had previous experience with questionnaire design and
data collection and analysis. The nature of this project allowed for
change and retooling when necessary.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
Radical
improvements in HIV care, changes in environment, staffing, and
procedures along with variable client retention limit the ability to
fully understand the impact of nutrition services on patient health
outcomes.
|
Factors that Ensured
Success:
There
has been continuity in key project staff and a subset of clients who have regularly participated
over the five years.
|
| Achievement 6: Practical
lessons from this project have been communicated to others who may
be able to improve their care and/or services as a result of what we
have learned. |
|
Key
Elements for
Success:
Presentation
by team members representing different disciplines (medical,
behavioral, nutrition) allows us to present different perspectives
and reach a broader audience. Sufficient project and/or university
funding and support was present to allow for travel to and
presentation of findings at local, national, and international
meetings.
|
Factors that Limited
Success:
Interruptions
in continuous project implementation and early difficulties in
obtaining staff cooperation in recruiting clients extended the time
needed to gather necessary data to answer basic questions.
|
Factors that Ensured
Success:
We
maintained a clear focus on the needs of clinicians and clients, and
we worked to identify cost-effective, practical methods and tools to
deliver nutrition services in the small outpatient HIV clinic.
Cooperation and support from our state AIDS Education and Training
Centers and contacts and involvement with national professional
organizations were very important in accessing avenues for
dissemination of findings.
|

|
1.
Lesson Learned: Constant
change and personnel needs must be anticipated and accommodated. Risk
taking and trying new ideas are essential as is clear communication
with clients and staff about why changes are occurring.
|
|
How
related to achievements: An
ability to deal with change and to understand the needs and
priorities of the larger environment minimizes frustration and
fosters a positive attitude that allows for progress in the face of
difficulty.
|
|
2.
Lesson Learned: The
attitudes of clinic staff toward nutrition services are very
powerful in determining their success (ability to reach and serve
clients). Support from medical staff and administrators is
essential.
|
|
How
related to achievements: Good
communication with clinic administrators and staff about the
potential benefits of an "outside" project such as ours to
both clients and to the larger mission of the clinic are needed on
an ongoing basis to build support.
|
|
3.
Lesson Learned: It
is important to be visible in the community forums (as with
consortia meetings, clinic meetings, etc.) to discuss successes of
and continuing need for nutrition services and to specifically ask
policy makers to include funding for their continuation.
|
|
How
related to achievements: There
are many competing and important needs in the HIV community and
limited funds. Similarly, there are many demands on the time and
attention of administrators. Constant reminders and assistance with
budget projections are helpful in ensuring continued funding for
nutrition services.
|
|
4.
Lesson Learned: Clinics
are busy, hectic places. Staff often feel overwhelmed with present
duties, and client can be inundated with paperwork. Any new
procedures or forms must be perceived as absolutely important and
must be extremely short and simple.
|
|
How
related to achievements: Acknowledgment
and understanding of the needs and schedules of staff and clients
set the stage for development of an efficient, simple system.
|
|
5. Lesson Learned: Project
findings and outcomes need to be evaluated and examined cross-sectionally
to account for distinct periods of HIV management (e.g. pre-PI vs.
post-PI) and differences in extent of integration of nutrition
services with medical care.
|
|
How related to achievements: Nutrition
exerts effects on health and disease within an extremely complex
system. Efforts to identify specific benefits resulting from
nutrition services must attempt to control for the multitude of
other potentially explanatory factors.
|
|
6. Lesson Learned: Clear,
down-to-earth communication about what worked, what didn't and why
is appreciated by both clients and caregivers. Sharing of tools
developed and permission to adapt is also received with
appreciation.
|
|
How related to achievements: We
have been able to share our ideas and lessons learned with a wide
audience. Our openness to share has also encouraged others to give
us feedback and ideas that have enhanced what we do and what we have
learned.
|
Completed
by: Trudy
A. Larson, M.D.
Last
Updated: July 1999

Project Resource Page
Evaluation Data
Last Updated:
August 02, 2001; data through
June 15, 1999; analyses conducted January 2000.
|
Knowledge Base Citation: The Knowledge Base and
this Knowledge Item were designed and authored by G.
J. Huba, Ph.D.; in collaboration with Lisa A. Melchior, Ph.D.; A. T. Panter, Ph.D.; and the staff of The Measurement Group. Cite this work as
"Huba, G. J., Melchior, L. A., and Panter, A. T. (1998 - 2001). The Measurement Group Knowledge Base on HIV/AIDS
Care. On the World Wide Web: http://www.TheMeasurementGroup.com."
Questions or
Comments:
Contact The Measurement
Group.
Use of Knowledge Base
Information: Acceptable Uses and
Limitations.
Collaborators from
Participating Projects: Cooperative
Agreement Steering Committee 1999.
Participating
Projects: This Knowledge Base is based on
the service delivery experiences of 27 Cooperative Agreement Projects on Innovative Models
of HIV/AIDS Care. These projects and the Evaluation and Dissemination Center
which produced this Knowledge Base were funded by the Health
Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau (HAB) as Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS)
between 1994 and 1999.
Why This Evaluation was
Conducted: Editorial.
More Information: Design
of this Knowledge Base.
Recommended Citation
Format for Web Materials: American
Psychological Association Publication Manual Section, Revised 2001.
Work on the Knowledge Base and the
cross-cutting evaluation was supported in part by Grant Number 5 U90 HA 00030-05 from the
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HIV/AIDS Bureau's (HAB) Special Projects of National Significance
(SPNS). The contents of this Knowledge Base are
solely the responsibility of The Measurement Group and do not necessarily represent the official
views of HRSA or HRSA/HAB's Special Projects of National Significance
nor may they represent the positions of the individual grantees whose
projects are included in the cross-cutting evaluation.
|
Copyright © 2005 by The Measurement
Group LLC. All rights reserved. This may not be current and will not be updated.
|
|